If he didn't have a license to practice law, then he couldn't be Attorney General, right?
And after watching his dismal performance in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee (again) yesterday, it is apparent that he is lying or unfit to hold the job due to serious illness (eg: Alzheimers disease).
Either way, it sounds like grounds for disbarrment from the Texas Bar Association.
Comments?
Charity: I'm not a Democrat nor a liberal progressive. But Gonzales is completely unfit for the job. His nomination should have never been allowed to go through and should have been stopped short like Harriet Miers.
DavidMi: How do you resolve the fact that Gonzales could not answer 1 single question posed by Senator Arlen Spector yesterday? Spector started tossing him softballs too and Gonzales could not answer the questions with a simple yes or no.
1 comment… read it below or add one
Unlike a lot of state governments which have laws requiring anyone who runs for Attorney General to be a member of the bar, there is no such requirement for US Attorney General. Congress can remove him from office through the impeachment process, and he will probably be a lot easier to remove from office than President Bush.
You must log in to post a comment.